What allegations of “Toxic Culture” can teach us about Organisational Psychology

Image of woman with her face in her hands while colleagues look on jokingly

Recent reporting about allegations of bullying and a “toxic work culture” at the University of South Wales prompted me to reflect on some of the broader organisational psychology dynamics that can emerge within workplace cultures generally.
Read the BBC report here.

Situations like this often raise important questions about: 

  • psychological safety

  • leadership culture

  • organisational silence

  • power dynamics

  • and how organisations respond when concerns are raised internally 

Because when terms like “toxic culture” repeatedly emerge within organisations, they are rarely only describing interpersonal conflict. 

More often, they reflect wider systemic and psychological patterns that have developed over time. 

Image representing culture repair, diagnostics and interventions

Toxic cultures are usually systemic, not individual 

One of the biggest misconceptions about unhealthy workplace cultures is that they are caused solely by a few difficult people. In reality, cultures are shaped by systems. 

They are influenced by: 

  • leadership behaviours

  • communication patterns

  • accountability structures

  • workload pressures

  • hierarchy

  • organisational priorities

  • and what behaviours become tolerated or normalised over time 

This is why toxic cultures rarely emerge overnight. They often develop gradually through repeated experiences where employees feel: 

  • unheard 

  • unsupported

  • psychologically unsafe

  • or unable to influence the environment around them 

Organisational silence 

One of the most important psychological concepts in these situations is organisational silence. This occurs when employees begin to perceive that speaking openly is risky, ineffective, or professionally unsafe. 

Over time, people may start believing: 

  • “There’s no point raising concerns.”

  • “Nothing will change.”

  • “Speaking up could damage my career.”

  • “It’s safer to stay quiet.” 

When this happens, organisations lose access to honest feedback about what staff are genuinely experiencing. Problems then remain hidden beneath the surface for long periods of time, often until external scrutiny forces them into the open. 

Importantly, organisational silence is not always intentional. Sometimes it emerges unintentionally within high-pressure environments where leaders are overwhelmed, communication becomes defensive, or staff no longer feel psychologically safe enough to challenge upwards. 

Learned helplessness in workplace cultures 

Another mechanism that can emerge in unhealthy organisational systems is learned helplessness

When people repeatedly experience: 

  • inaction after concerns are raised,

  • inconsistent leadership responses,

  • defensiveness,

  • perceived lack of influence, 

they can begin to psychologically disengage from trying to improve the situation altogether. This can manifest as: 

  • emotional withdrawal

  • cynicism

  • burnout

  • presenteeism

  • low morale

  • reduced trust

  • increased sickness absence 

Importantly, this is not simply about resilience or coping skills. It is often a human response to feeling powerless within the wider system. 

The role of hierarchy and power 

In many professional environments - including universities, healthcare organisations, and other large institutions - hierarchy plays a significant psychological role. 

Career progression can depend heavily on: 

  • senior relationships

  • reputation

  • sponsorship

  • references

  • opportunities

  • internal networks 

This can create strong power dynamics, particularly if psychological safety is weak. In these cultures, harmful behaviours are not always overt. 

They may emerge through: 

  • exclusion

  • withholding opportunities

  • reputational undermining

  • procedural targeting

  • social isolation

  • subtle intimidation 

These behaviours can be difficult to challenge openly when individuals fear professional consequences. 

Image representing culture repair, diagnostics and interventions

Psychological safety matters 

Healthy organisational cultures are not cultures without disagreement, challenge, or mistakes. 

They are cultures where people feel psychologically safe enough to: 

  • raise concerns

  • admit uncertainty

  • challenge appropriately

  • discuss mistakes openly

  • trust that concerns will be handled fairly 

Psychological safety is not about lowering standards or avoiding accountability. It is about creating environments where people do not feel punished simply for speaking honestly about problems. 

Without psychological safety, organisations lose one of their most important mechanisms for learning and improvement. 

Culture is defined by experience, not statements 

Many organisations have strong values statements. But culture is not defined by what is written on websites or displayed on office walls. 

Culture is defined by: 

  • how people experience leadership

  • how concerns are responded to

  • what behaviours are rewarded

  • what behaviours are ignored

  • whether employees feel safe enough to be truthful about what is happening internally 

This is why conversations about toxic culture matter. Not simply because of reputational risk, but because workplace cultures have profound psychological consequences for the people working within them. 

And ultimately, healthy organisations are not those that never experience difficulty. 

They are organisations willing to reflect honestly on the systems, behaviours, and conditions that shape how people experience work. 


Share


Comments

Leave a comment on this post

Thank you for for the comment. It will be published once approved.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.